LeftyBassist.com

The online home for southpaw bassists.
It is currently January 16th, 2025, 9:47 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: December 9th, 2014, 5:27 pm
Posts: 3530
Location: Beantown
http://rvrb.io/1982-4001c64s-left-r5s


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 14th, 2008, 1:45 pm
Posts: 3950
Location: Huntsville, AL
8-)

_________________
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ef=profile

www.twitter.com/ReallyMattRoss

Penguins is practically chickens.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 9th, 2008, 7:46 am
Posts: 3907
Location: West Orange, NJ
Didn't those basses originally come with the horseshoe bridge PUP?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: Cincinnati
This is not a C64S, and as far as I can tell, it isn't even a C64. It looks like a re-branded 4001S.

A C64 should have vintage-style tone-knobs:
Image

And a C64 should have a pickguard that goes all the way to the bridge surround, and the bridge surround should be trapezoidal, not square:
Image

pjmuck wrote:
Didn't those basses originally come with the horseshoe bridge PUP?

Yes, and this is not a reissue horseshoe pickup. The reissue horseshoe has very large silver pole pieces.

Just to be clear, the reissue horseshoe pickup works like a normal pickup (meaning the horseshoe isn't part of the pickup), but voiced to sound like the original horseshoe pickup as much as possible. It also has a gap in the pickup cover to look more like the original:
Image

RIC did away with the "real" horseshoe pickup because they are notorious for losing their magnetism, which requires them to be re-gaussed.

_________________
Gilmourisgod wrote:
I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.


Last edited by superheavydeathmetal on December 2nd, 2015, 8:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: July 9th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Posts: 942
I'm no Ric expert, but all of these attributes on one Ric bass seems odd:

- toaster pickup, 1" from neck
- two-piece neck
- open back tuners
- no binding, dot inlay
- serial 1982
- one-piece pick guard
- bridge with extra two screws near tail
- no center stripe

???


Last edited by bbl on December 2nd, 2015, 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: Cincinnati
bbl wrote:
I'm no Ric expert, but all of these attributes on one Ric bass seems odd:

- toaster pickup, 1" from neck <- Good catch!
- two-piece neck <- I am not sure.
- open back tuners <- I am not sure.
- no binding, dot inlay <- This is correct for a C64.
- serial 1982 <- This is way too early for a C64.
- one-piece pick guard <-This is correct for a C64.
- bridge with extra two screws near tail <- Good catch!

???

Geoff,
Good detective work! See my comments in red.

Yeah, nothing about this is right.

_________________
Gilmourisgod wrote:
I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 2nd, 2015, 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: July 9th, 2008, 4:39 pm
Posts: 942
And no center stripe.

A 4003S with a toaster replacement?

An SB?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 3rd, 2015, 6:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 9th, 2008, 7:46 am
Posts: 3907
Location: West Orange, NJ
superheavydeathmetal wrote:
This is not a C64S, and as far as I can tell, it isn't even a C64. It looks like a re-branded 4001S.

A C64 should have vintage-style tone-knobs:
Image

And a C64 should have a pickguard that goes all the way to the bridge surround, and the bridge surround should be trapezoidal, not square:
Image

pjmuck wrote:
Didn't those basses originally come with the horseshoe bridge PUP?

Yes, and this is not a reissue horseshoe pickup. The reissue horseshoe has very large silver pole pieces.

Just to be clear, the reissue horseshoe pickup works like a normal pickup (meaning the horseshoe isn't part of the pickup), but voiced to sound like the original horseshoe pickup as much as possible. It also has a gap in the pickup cover to look more like the original:
Image

RIC did away with the "real" horseshoe pickup because they are notorious for losing their magnetism, which requires them to be re-gaussed.


Great info, thanks. I knew it didn't look "right", but I'm not that knowledgeable on the various differences with Ricks.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 3rd, 2015, 6:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 13th, 2008, 6:40 am
Posts: 825
Location: Austin,Texas
Looks like a 4003SB to me.

_________________
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" Austin Music Poll 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 3rd, 2015, 7:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 20th, 2011, 7:56 am
Posts: 371
Location: Toronto, ON - Canada
AustinLeftyBass wrote:
Looks like a 4003SB to me.


I could be wrong but... I think the 4003SB would have stereo outputs. This mystery bass does not.

_________________
Sometimes I think, maybe I'm lucky I'm left handed. If I could play any bass I wanted, my collection would REALLY be out of control.

http://whitecowbell.com
http://www.facebook.com/southpawl.jones
http://goo.gl/rMTPk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 3rd, 2015, 6:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 20th, 2013, 6:09 pm
Posts: 1240
Location: Cincinnati
jayceofbass wrote:
AustinLeftyBass wrote:
Looks like a 4003SB to me.


I could be wrong but... I think the 4003SB would have stereo outputs. This mystery bass does not.


The listing has been changed to an SB. But I don't know that it is an SB, either. The SB would have the stereo output, a two-piece pickguard, and closed tuners.

On the other hand, I have heard that specs of the SB varied quite a bit, so maybe an SB is just whatever Rick decided to call an SB at the time. :lol:

_________________
Gilmourisgod wrote:
I never really "got" what a Rick is capable of until I ran it stereo a few times in my college band. We used to call it the "Piano of Doom". You get all the bottom and all the top in total a**kicking mode.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: 82 Rick 4001
PostPosted: December 5th, 2015, 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: January 10th, 2014, 1:05 am
Posts: 49
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Yeah, Rickenbacker replaced the Horseshoe bridge pick up, and the toaster at the neck, with Hi-Gains in late summer of 1973. They did away with the checkerboard binding a few months before that. I know; my '73 4001 was "born" in October, so I just missed out... Still has the "Wavy Grover" tuners, though... So, that one wouldn't have them, and IIRC, any Rick made after '73 with a Horse shoe, would have a Repro one. And yes, the original horse shoes did have problems with losing magnetism. John Hall has stated more than once that they were a nightmare to make, too. I know someone was making copies of the originals (can't remember who), until they got sued (there's a big surprise); I do remember reading that they said that yes, they were a royal PITA to make - and they were priced accordingly. I do know they settled out of court; whether the pickups are available or not, I couldn't say..


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits