Psycho Bass Guy wrote:
Specifically, the LMII is one severly overhyped amp, IMO. I spent a LOT of time with a few of them and couldn't get anywhere near the balls or punch out of it that I expect in a bass amp. The tone was always thin, and yes, I knew how to operate its tone controls and filters. No matter what the settings, there was always a harsh upper-midrange artifact and a thin bottom. I just got variations on that sound with lots of different cabs. On the soundclips posted on TB, my FFT software confirmed what I was hearing, so it's not a case of bias; what I hear IS there. To be clear, weight and size don't automatically make an amp desirable to me. I just want to know what it is in the sound of amps like the LMII that makes people so nuts for them. They sound like crap to me.
Gee, I use an LMII with Bergantino HT/EX 112 cabs. It's plenty loud for the venues I play - 200 to 300 seats - and folks are always complimenting me on my tone, regardless of what bass I use. I've got more bottom than I can use and I've never noticed a harshness in the upper mids.
what sold me on them and the cabs wasn't just weight and size - tho that was a major consideration as I have back issues. i was a little concerned when I first bought the LMII (I'm really into tubes), but after using it at home at low volume I was able to dial in some dang awesome sounds. Of course it doesn't sound like a 1970 SVT, but I find it to be very transparent in it's own right and allows me to get classic 70's Roger Waters out of my Pbass, or smooth jazz tones through my Ken Smith, and lots of Squire growl from my Ric.
Though I am heavily influenced by specs and software results, I try not to have them be the deciding factor. Tone is in the heart and hands, not the software or hardware. I've had amazing results from totally out of spec gear that defies logic.