tomdbass wrote:
I understand the idea of relicing a body of a bass-even the back of the neck (and believe me, I'm not condoning this butcher job) but when has the finish on a headstock ever worn away? I can see some dings, scratches, lacquer/finish checking..etc. But how would the finish wear off a part of the bass that's never really touched other than tuning it-and even then, the wear would be on the chrome/nickel plating of the gears. What's even funnier is that the seller believes that relicing this bass has increased it's value when it's actually done the opposite. Some people need to be slapped every once in awhile just to make sure they don't do stuff like this......
Agreed on this... I've Never seen a Ric, or for that matter, Any finished headstock that had that kind of natural wear to it... this guy has gone Way overboard on the "relic-ed" definition, and as previously stated, he's done something to a Ric that just wouldn't happen to one in the normal gigging world- their finish is just that tough!