Agent00Soul wrote:
Matt R. wrote:
I wish they weren't all basswood.
Out of curiosity, what's wrong with basswood? I've never owned an instrument made with it but I know a lot are...
I've owned maybe 7 MIJ Jazz basses through the years, and I also share Matt's dislike of basswood bodies. I had one that was alder, and that was a great bass (I put Dimarzios in it), but the rest of the basses were basswood, and I always felt they lacked focus and punch, no matter what pickups I installed. I tried Bartolinis, Duncan Antiquity IIs, Dimarzio, etc, and I never quite got the same sound of that alder one.
Although, I'm nit-picky. I would dare to say that 99% of players out there don't really care, or won't know the difference. Those MIJ are lifesavers for us lefties who love Fender. Besides the sound, basswood is really prone to dents, because the wood¡s so soft, so they don't age that nicely.
My scientific explanation is that the basswood used in this MIJs is young wood that has not been dried to its full potential, hence why these basswood model are the cheapest of the MIJ line. The alder and ash model cost more, in part because the wood itself is more expensive, and because the factories might let them dry longer, which costs more.
I'm no wood expect, but I would also say that because basswood is so soft and porous, it's actually too resonant, but more like a sponge, and it absorbs too much of the sound, instead of letting it bounce and project. Alder and ash that is well-dried is resonant and light, but still remains structurally strong.
IMHO.