LeftyBassist.com

Just wondering what all us lefties thought about reverse headstocks, especially on a Fender bass (looks, functionality, etc.). Thanks.

no specific preference for me

I asked this same question a while back (on this site or another, I don't remember now) and the response was pretty significant in the overall 'dislike' for a reverse (i.e. righty) headstock on a lefty body

all the best,

R

I can't stand the look of it, even on basses with that intentional flopped look like the Kramer stuff.

Come on, admit it, this looks ridiculous:

http://www.gbase.com/Stores/Gear/GearDe ... tem=780752

The only bass it doesn't bother me on is a Rick, and that's because they used righty necks/headstocks just as often, if not more often, than lefty necks on their lefties. Even McCartney's bass had a righty neck.

do not like

I think for me it's that it reminds me of having to play righties upside-down.

I tend to like the reverse headstock because it's different, and if it's on a lefty, doesn't appear as an obvious gimmick. A reverse headstock with the Fender logo right-side up looks like a gimmick to me, especially on a righty guitar (a company that charges more for lefties, yet puts a lefty neck on a righty production guitar, is clearly doing it for as a gimmick i.e., the Hendrix guitar).

I was thinking about building a precision style bass from non-Fender parts and going with a reverse headstock. Then if I decided to make it a hobby (assembling basses), the reverse headstock could be my "gimm..." er, my "thing."

I know this is an old thread, but I figured I would throw this pic in. My frankenfender.

Hey BBL,how's that MM Sterling workin for ya? There are some days I really miss that piece! Steve/poorlefty

I saw a telecaster type bass with a reverse headstock. I liked it

Re: Reverse Headstocks
What about the headstock on that Rickenbacker 4001(3) in the background?

I can go either way on Ric headstocks.

][/quote]What about the headstock on that Rickenbacker 4001(3) in the background?

That's a 79 4001 with a reverse headstock....I like that look also.

Hey Steve aka poorlefty! Glad to see you here.

Still have the trans green Sterling. I play it on a few songs, but not much overall. Still pristine. That fretless MM tone really cuts though. I have to be better at taming this beast!

Still have that MIJ Jazz in sonic blue? That bass set off my crazy obsession with sonic blue (and I still don't have a bass in that color!).

Geoff aka bbl

I have always detested right handed necks on lefty basses, or reverse headstocks.

Rickenbacker is especially annoying to me. In recent years they started making lefty necks but continued to use right handed fretboards That is the reason I promised never to purchase a new Ric, I don't want my money going to Jim Hall.

Of course it doesn't matter now since Rickenbacker has announced that they will no longer make lefthanded instruments.

I really like the look of tele type necks upsidedown ... Other than that, I am not really a fan. I generally take things on a case by case basis, but upsidedown headstocks seem like an exception. Cheers all.

I'm in 100% agreement with pjmuck..it looks stupid, retarded, silly, obnoxious...even on righty guitars and basses that have them reversed...just too weird for me, but bought one anyway :
it DOES fit in my righty case with a little cutting of the styrofoam on the upper horn....lol



and here's a shot when I swapped my charvel necks for a couple days just to take a couple pics, play them that way and then put them back to normal...


.

I dislike reverse headstocks.

They look a little weird, but i've got used to them and prefer having the tuners on the lower side

I'm not ripping on anyone who has a rev-head and likes it
tuners up or down that was never a factor for me, just too weird looking.

kinda like this one on the left, it's cool, just not for me and I wanted to make my cheap Charvel look like it...FAIL ( maybe it would have looked better with a fin neck? ) --

.