LeftyBassist.com
http://leftybassist.com./

G&L MJ-4
http://leftybassist.com./viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6954		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ March 10th, 2016, 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:  G&L MJ-4
Hey guys, my G&L MJ-4 showed up yesterday!

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


I originally went for a JB, but they aren't offered in lefty, so I went with this instead. I went a little crazy on options, so there is no way I could ever get back what I paid for it, haha. I didn't realize just how much I spent on options until I saw in the video below that street value starts at $1300. Whoa! I paid WAY more. The stainless steel frets were the real killer.

Here we go:
Ash body (option for standard finishes)
Lake Placid Blue (standard)
Quartersawn neck (option)
Maple fretboard (standard)
1.5" nut width (option. 1 5/8" is standard)
9.5" fretboard radius (standard)
stainless steel frets (huge option)
reversed headstock (option)
Graph-tech nut (option)
silver-on-black logo (standard)

It is MUCH lighter than I thought it would be. It weighs notably less than my Ash/Maple Fender Japan Jazz or Ash/Maple Sire V7. It plays great. The frets are much higher than I am used to, but that really didn't require any adjustment on my end. As you may have noticed by the pictures, the intonation needs to be adjusted. The saddle positions look more typical of a right-handed bass.

It plays great and sounds killer. It can sound much more aggressive than how the guy in the video below has it EQ'ed. I nailed the Tim Commerford "Evil Empire" tone (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGBcckebs24) with this bass, a B7K and a Bass Pod XT using the Rock Classic model.

Here is a great video demonstrating this bass:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8V8CuuBZ0g

He nailed it when he said the midrange control is great. It's not too low to make it sound boomy and not to high to make it sound nasal or quacky. It just helps it sound more "present."

Now, I just have to figure out how to get a D-tuner on the reversed headstock!
\m/ Rock on!
Author:  paulo [ March 10th, 2016, 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Wow that's what i call money well spent! :P ;)
Love the LPB on it! Congrats and i won't need to tell you to enjoy the heck out of it!
Author:  tim [ March 10th, 2016, 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Wow.

I'm too tired to elaborate, but there's a lot behind that wow :^)

Including rethinking a Warwick...
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ March 11th, 2016, 1:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
Wow.

I'm too tired to elaborate, but there's a lot behind that wow :^)

Including rethinking a Warwick...

Ha! Well, it all depends on what sound you are after. The MJ-4 has your typical aggressive jazz tone (I like to describe it as,"throaty" since I don't know a better word). Warwicks, at least the Thumb, are more dark and grumbley.

While I prefer the jazz sound over the Warwick sound, the Thumb is unparalleled for slap. It never gets harsh or clanky, and will therefore always have a place in my stable.

Also, as an aside, I am not as in love with the reversed headstock as I thought I would be. It's okay, but I guess the shape of that headstock doesn't lend itself to looking super-cool when reversed like some other instruments. I like it for being unique, but there is an added difficulty with adding a D-tuner that I have yet to solve.
Author:  tim [ March 11th, 2016, 1:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
I thought the reverse headstock was to help with string break of a thick string, like if you tune BEAD. I started thinking about tuning a bass down like that a couple weeks ago and stumbled across a picture of Tim C with his reverse headstock jazz.

Attachments:
56256659.jpg
56256659.jpg [ 473.61 KiB | Viewed 31712 times ]
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ March 11th, 2016, 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
I thought the reverse headstock was to help with string break of a thick string.

It doesn't have any effect on string tension, so, as far as I know, it's strictly cosmetic.
Author:  tim [ March 11th, 2016, 2:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Not tension, but the angle of the string across the nut.

Edit: I'm not saying that it definitely DOES have an effect, but you mentioned the other Tim so I wondered if you had a non-cosmetic reason for reversing the head.
Author:  jayceofbass [ March 11th, 2016, 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Man, this looks really great. I kinda dig the reverse headstock to be honest. But, I've never gone that route for the exact reason you mention. Can't put a D-Tuner on it. I use those on all my basses and even use them mid song on a couple of numbers. I'm lost without them. If you do figure out a way to make a D-Tuner work on the reverse headstock, let me know how you did it.
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ March 11th, 2016, 3:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
Not tension, but the angle of the string across the nut.

Ah, gotcha. I had not heard that before. My choice was strictly cosmetic.

My mention of his tone on Evil Empire and finding a picture of him with a reversed headstock is just a coincidence. I didn't know he ever played a bass with a reversed headstock. I just like his tone (ground-shaking and grinding) and his style (simple and effective).

jayceofbass wrote:
Man, this looks really great. I kinda dig the reverse headstock to be honest. But, I've never gone that route for the exact reason you mention. Can't put a D-Tuner on it. I use those on all my basses and even use them mid song on a couple of numbers. I'm lost without them. If you do figure out a way to make a D-Tuner work on the reverse headstock, let me know how you did it.

I didn't realize it wasn't possible until it was too late. I called the dealer to see if I could cancel that option, but it was too late. That's okay, though. I am kind of looking forward to the challenge of finding a way to get it on there without putting any extra holes in the bass.

I am willing to modify instruments to some degree, but adding holes is something I won't do, especially a piece like this.
Author:  tim [ March 11th, 2016, 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Maybe you could call these guys and ask if they plan to make a bass version:

http://www.pitch-key.com/
Author:  Jeroen [ March 12th, 2016, 3:23 am ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
Not tension, but the angle of the string across the nut.

Not if you put a string retainer behind the nut like in Tim Commerford's pic. Looks like a pretty sharp angle.
Author:  fivebass52 [ March 12th, 2016, 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
Maybe you could call these guys and ask if they plan to make a bass version:

http://www.pitch-key.com/


Wow, that is a cool de-tuner! I wonder if a bass model would indeed work on thicker strings as effectively...

OK, just sent them an email - will let you know what the response is as soon as I receive one...
Author:  fivebass52 [ March 14th, 2016, 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
fivebass52 wrote:
tim wrote:
Maybe you could call these guys and ask if they plan to make a bass version:

http://www.pitch-key.com/


Wow, that is a cool de-tuner! I wonder if a bass model would indeed work on thicker strings as effectively...

OK, just sent them an email - will let you know what the response is as soon as I receive one...


OK, this is the email I got back from the Rep....

Aloha Ian!

Thanks for writing in - actually we're very interested in a Bass version of the Pitch-Key - this would be a model specially for Bass and 7/8 string or Baritone guitars and it has been a popular request. The only problem we have at the moment is that on a P (or J) Bass, the tuning post is quite close to the nut which doesn't give us much room to work with. We could easily make a 'bigger' design but if it doesn't fit the above mentioned instruments, then it might have limited appeal.

Now, ironically this would not be a problem on a Bass with a reverse headstock because of the long string length between the nut and the 'E' tuning post - but on a normal headstock, the 'E' post is the closest to the nut.

I'd be very interested in your thoughts on this as a bassist yourself!

Best regards,

Alasdair Bryce
Pitch-Key
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ March 15th, 2016, 7:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
Maybe you could call these guys and ask if they plan to make a bass version:

http://www.pitch-key.com/

fivebass52 wrote:
OK, this is the email I got back from the Rep....

This is most excellent! I will definitely investigate this. I can't help but wonder how it might affect the tension of the A string, but we shall see! I am especially glad that there are no modifications to the instrument required.

Maybe this would also be a better alternative to a D-tuner for my Warwick Thumb.

I get a lot of inconsistency in tuning with the D-tuner on my Thumb. I am not sure if that is caused by the angled tuners (the lever of the D-tuner sometimes hits the tuning key for the G string) or what.
Author:  bhunt1 [ March 15th, 2016, 2:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
that bass is beautiful - congrats!
Author:  fivebass52 [ March 15th, 2016, 8:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
superheavydeathmetal wrote:
tim wrote:
Maybe you could call these guys and ask if they plan to make a bass version:

http://www.pitch-key.com/

fivebass52 wrote:
OK, this is the email I got back from the Rep....

This is most excellent! I will definitely investigate this. I can't help but wonder how it might affect the tension of the A string, but we shall see! I am especially glad that there are no modifications to the instrument required.

Maybe this would also be a better alternative to a D-tuner for my Warwick Thumb.

I get a lot of inconsistency in tuning with the D-tuner on my Thumb. I am not sure if that is caused by the angled tuners (the lever of the D-tuner sometimes hits the tuning key for the G string) or what.


You should contact the company, and become a beta tester! Sounds like these guys are enthusiastic and motivated to get into the bass market. The string tree/button, and especially the first tuner post is their big challenge...
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ September 11th, 2019, 11:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
tim wrote:
I thought the reverse headstock was to help with string break of a thick string, like if you tune BEAD. I started thinking about tuning a bass down like that a couple weeks ago and stumbled across a picture of Tim C with his reverse headstock jazz.


I'm going to resurrect this thread for a moment because I just happened to see a video the other day that showed that very picture of Tim Commerford, and that bass was in fact tuned to B. The video explains that Commerford used a reversed headstock because he believed that it would give him better sustain on the B string.

It's at 7:57:
https://youtu.be/eFZyiDXCnck#t=7m57s
Author:  tim [ September 11th, 2019, 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Ah ha!
Author:  superheavydeathmetal [ July 28th, 2020, 1:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
You guys, I am over the moon right now. I love this bass. I finally got home Sunday evening, and ran it into a pair of stacked B7Ks (something I never thought of doing before now), and it sounds awesome!

Do you know that feeling, when you have a killer tone and it makes you want to play and play and play? That's how I feel.

Now, I love the Zon I just got, and I haven't had the chance to do a direct comparison of the two, but going by memory I really think the G&L is the superior bass in terms of tone, especially in the low end. The low end on the G&L is MEAN!. Maybe it's the strings I put on the Zon or differences in setup. I look forward to doing a direct comparison when I can.

Image

It is interesting that I got the G&L to replace the Zon Sonus I had that I wish I had not gotten rid of. Well, now that I have the VB4, which I can only imagine sounds very similar to the Sonus, I see that I ended up with the better bass in the G&L.

My point is, it's funny how things work out sometimes. If I had not made the "mistake" of getting rid of the Sonus, I would never have gotten the G&L, which I now believe to be the better-sounding bass.
Author:  tim [ July 28th, 2020, 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: G&L MJ-4
Yup! Yup, that's how I feel every time I plug in my SB-2 with TI flats. I've got the kiloton, an L2k, an SB-1, and now a Warwick Streamer. I plug them all in and they sound great. But when I drift back to the SB-2, it's me. Nothing missing and nothing extra.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/