superheavydeathmetal wrote:
Of course I love it, but that is a crazy price. Anyone would be better off getting a new or slightly used Rick. I get how someone might think it's worth that much since it is an old bass in pretty good shape (that bass extender could have been installed without adding any holes to the headstock), but the late '70s - early '80s the least-sought-after and least-valuable era of the 4001/4003.
It's not old enough to have the original horseshoe/toaster pickups or checkerboard binding, but it is old enough to not be a 4003 (i.e. it has the original, weak, single truss rod design, and original bridge without the back screws, which is very prone to lift).
But, it's a Rick, and I love it.
Not sure what you mean. This bass has dual truss rods. All Ricks have had dual truss rods since their inception in 1961. As for the comment about the truss rod being weak, I strongly disagree. The older "hairpin" truss rod design is very stable IF it's properly set. My '79 4001 has one of the most stable necks I've ever encountered. In 20 years, I have not had to adjust the neck once! I can leave that bass untouched for months, if not a year+, take it out of it's case, and it will still be in tune. I suspect the bad reputation that older Rick necks get is largely due to people not knowing how to adjust them properly.